Laura Barcziová
Laura Barcziová
@kaosiso hi, thanks for the interest! Let us know if anything is unclear.
The file you linked contains just the documentation of this option, but to implement the original issue, you should have a look at this PackageConfigValidator [here](https://github.com/packit/packit/blob/main/packit/config/package_config_validator.py), where we would like...
Still relevant.
Hi! Thanks a lot for the contribution, as this work became a priority for us, this was implemented in #927, therefore closing.
thanks both for the efforts! @p0tat0chip if you already have the code you can also submit a PR, but as @olamidepeterojo wrote, since he indicated his effort earlier, we would...
hi and thanks for the effort on this issue! Considering this has become a priority for us, I'm currently working on the implementation. You can check my progress in #925,...
@LecrisUT I see, we could have the functionality only in the new class while still preserving the old interface (e.g. pull_request.patch would call the new method) to maintain backward compatibility....
hi @hroncok. When discussing this within the team, we were not able to decide the priority of this issue, we would like to ask you whether this is a blocking...
Sure, we appreciate it. Thanks for the explanation, this helps us a lot with the followup planning decisions.
Does it make sense to do this for pending statuses as well? It could improve the UX when the jobs get stuck.