Laurence Lundblade
Laurence Lundblade
Well, um there's no CBOR system/protocol design service available here. :-) If you haven't seen it already, the example source files output and decode a small structure. They could maybe...
No further comments. Closing this issue.
If I were doing QCBOR over again, I would use the linux/arm style as I have come to like it better. But... All of QCBOR is in a consistent style...
Not merging this to keep QCBOR simpler and cleaner and in just one coding style.
Looks like gcc 10.2 has some warnings that 10.1 doesn't. I don't think there are any real problems in QCBOR, but I will figure out a fix in the next...
I've spent some time on this and so far can't replicate it and haven't got to the bottom of it. When I try adding -Wmaybe-uninitialized for gcc-9, gcc-10 and gcc-11...
Closing this because I can't reproduce it, no one else has turned this and the filer of this hasn't commented further.
Hi, Yes, I'm very interested in this. I definitely want QCBOR fuzzed on a regular basis. I've tried to keep QCBOR very neat, portable and easy to build and integrate....
Yeah, it won't work. The tag will be applied to the integer map label. So you have to do this: QCBOREncode_AddInt64(qec, keyint); QCBOREncode_AddTag(qec, MyTag); QCBOREncode_OpenArray(qec);
Check this: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0043/latest