Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen
Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen
> #162 doesn't matter, we yanked that release Then I think we should just revert those commits. It's not even tagged, so it should be fine. > We could except...
Yes, this *should* be something that's fixable by `clean_rmeta()`, although that function was created to deal with `cargo check` followed by `cargo test`. I wonder if this is the same...
Hmm, looking at [`clean_rmeta()`](https://github.com/laumann/compiletest-rs/blob/a0f97ccc46512eb959fefffa2ef64d29e59bc1ef/src/common.rs#L258-L280), could it be that the filter: ``` .filter(|s| s.ends_with("/deps")) ``` is the problem?
You might also want to try not using `link_deps()` and just set `config.target_rustcflags` manually.
No problem :smile: This is a problem that's been a thorn in my side for some time, so it'd be nice to have it solved! Have fun at RustFest! Say...
Thanks for looking into this. Yes, you are correct, `link_deps()` just adds folders for rustc to find libraries. Usually you'd just set `target_rustcflags` to `-L target/debug` or something (the folder...
So we can pretty much say that the "duplicate" `rlib`s are the problem. Question is then, how do we fix it? Can we identify which is which? If so, we...
OK, thanks again for looking into it :smiley:
Thanks for looking further into this @aldanor :smile: Without yet having tried it, is this a replacement for `clean_rmeta()` or an added step? In either case, it looks like something...
@aldanor A PR would be nice - then we could ask others for feedback. I tried it out on the test-project and it seems to work fine.