Ganesh Iyer

Thanks Louis for your inputs. I have updated the code to improve the performance.

I've been trying different variants of the following query: ``` var ex4 = ply().apply("d", $("dataset").filter($("field2").in(0,1))) .apply("dd2", $("d").collect("$field2")) ``` or ``` var ex4 = ply().apply("d", $("dataset").filter($("field2").in(0,1))) .apply("dd", $("d").select("field1", "field2")) .apply("dd2", $("dd").collect("$field2"))...

Thanks for your help! Yes I'm able to the desired output by applying `.split()` before `.collect()`. Yes if this is a bug then I'm willing to put in a pull...

Yes I agree the documentation is really good! I'm not sure about this particular case, if this is the desired behavior. I'll keep it open for @vogievetsky to comment on.

Hi @spectr747 this is an experimental feature that I wrote many years ago. I'll have to look into the current crossfilter APIs to see what they use now instead of...