Larry Babb

> However, leaving it as non-identifiable (as it currently is) means that the `Genotype.members` array will not be sorted during serialization (but it should be). @ahwagner I'm not happy with...

> So I think we should add some implementation guidance to accommodate this, clarifying that all Alleles / Haplotypes represented in a Genotype are presumed to be _in-trans_ on homologous...

> Taking this approach is viable, but would also require us to add explicit indices for ComposedSequenceExpressions and other `array` structures where order is meaningful. @reece and @andreasprlic do you...

@ahwagner Thank you for clarifying that. I didn't see that initially. Then #2 would be my preference also.

Yes. We should clarify that it was a draft and we should reference the new concepts. Communication and transparency are paramount imo

I'm a fan... @ahwagner here's how it would look if we finally make that change to simplify sequencLocation that we've been discussing. Simplicity is the key. Now that we have...

Why not be able to use a CanonicalLocation (or named region aka gene) as the subject, too?

Looks great from my perspective. Very exciting to see the standard being applied in a real project. No major concerns at this point. FYI - Alex and I are discussing...

@mbaudis in the spirit of providing a singular way to represent the various components and concepts within VRS, our thinking is that when we use the integer number system to...

good call out, re: precision. I assume you are talking about whether 2.0 = 2.00 and that the digest for these two representations would be different even though they are...