Evan Croft
Evan Croft
@bseidlit Agreed. I have reverted those changes. I will fix the calibration file to use the expected convention
I do not completely disagree with @eumaka --I definitely think that whether the sEPD geometry handling should be done in CaloGeomMapping or in its own, separate module is worth further...
~~Could you clarify a bit about what you mean by the "initial stages" @bseidlit ? I assume that you mean something like an incremental rollout of the changes to sEPD...