Sean Gao

> Merging both concepts in the same validator will not allow to satisfy all the possible scenarios. On the other way having them separated allows you to use one or...

> Would you mind giving me an example of the numbers validation issues that your were referring in your comments and how it relates with the minLength validator? Hi @joanpablo,...

> I'd much prefer "re-using" the `ValidatorMessage.required` key. It could read: "required to be non-empty" and this feels quite natural to me. After some thought, it probably makes sense to...

Hi @joanpablo > `Validators.minLenght` is not supposed to be used with `num`, I still don't get an example of why you would like to use it. To be clear, using...

> You mentioned that using different validators depending on the type of question is complex, is that complexity due to Reactive Forms, or it is intrinsic to your project? Is...

@joanpablo Congratulations on the 15.0.0 release! I noticed there was a change of style for validators. Pushed additional changes to match the new style. Hope you are still interested in...

> Did you see the comments I left to you in the PR? > > The one that I particularly concerned is using that validator for numbers, it really confuses...