lantz

Is this necessary since #1100 was merged on February 23rd? Generally the master branch is intended to be usable, but probably you are right that we should do a 2.3.1.

Thanks for the heads up. It looks like a massive amount of new work for some unfortunate person (hopefully not me) to do, and transitions where you have to support...

Ah, this is essentially a duplicate of #1007, which also requests cgroup2 support. However, I think this issue is somewhat clearer vs. the vrf issue.

1. Sounds like your interfaces are being reconfigured, for example by a system service like networkmanager (which you should not run.) 2. Can you confirm that this happens with the...

I don't recommend running untrusted Python scripts (or any untrusted code) as root. If you're looking for an "exploit," why not just use the shell escape? mininet> sh rm /etc/passwd...

I'm not convinced that input vetting makes it any more secure, and it makes the code more complicated, which can make it harder to understand and less reliable. **However, feel...

I don't understand how the changes you suggest would somehow "make it safer?" I'm also a bit unclear on how would you "exploit" this without either 1) running malicious/untrusted code...

We could add this as an example.

I believe that my colleague has registered #mininet on libera, so we can use that. As you note we should update the web page to point to libera rather than...

Personally I'm fine with changing the license but it's somewhat tricky because it requires approval from ONF (probably not hard) and Stanford (harder!) It's basically a BSD 3-clause license but...