langou
langou
To be clear, are you complaining about this tarball: http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack-3.7.1.tgz ? A few days ago we had this commit on GitHub: https://github.com/Reference-LAPACK/lapack/commit/7438212bb72f56f4ef69a7a4ec1d127b703ac6cd But I do not see how this can...
Thanks for clarifying. I am not sure what happened. Yes I understand this is a problem for you. I am pretty sure this is not me because my netlib.org account...
I think this is the idea. We create a branch, and then it is supposed to be static indeed.
On the LAPACK side of things, we had a discussion about this and we decided to remove the meson build. See: https://github.com/Reference-LAPACK/lapack/pull/511 It is not my preference to add a...
Sounds good to me. A question I am asking myself is whether the testing should be enabled by default (and then deactivated by a flag) or whether the testing should...
Closed with PR #30
Thanks @martin-frbg for getting appveyor to work again!
Hi @dklyuchinskiy, (1) I think the tester of LAPACK (for example `ddrvge.f`, but also `ddrvgt.f`) do not use GECON and GTCON because these return condition number estimates as opposed to...
I agree with @martin-frbg that the set of functions in LAPACK and LAPACKE changes slowly. For LAPACKE, at this point, there is no script that I am aware of and...
Great. Thanks for the "how-to" @boboshaq. Sounds good to me. Closing the issue now.