lae

eͥ͛̍̉̓̌͟͏̴̵̢̙̟̤͖̻̪̹̗͚ͅę̛̻͉̮̩̙̯̤̯̰̭̫̖̖͂ͤͤ́̃́ͧ͠ͅe͈̻̰̮̗̞̣͇͓̯̞̓ͬ̄͛͊̃́̑͐̓ͮͧ͗͟͝e͗͛̄̂ͩ̅͏̻̦̮̬̞̹̜̫̫̦̗͓̦͎̠̱͘͘ ̢̨̨̤̪̳͇̖͈̯̼͍̪̞̦̻͓͇ͧ̇̑̾ͤͪ̃͆͊̅̊̊̃̀e̷͇͙͕̙͍̭̱̺ͯͥ̾̏ͮͬ͌̀͝ȅ̛͚̘̺̣̖̠͇̱͉̖̮͇̩̥̖͚̪̔͋̎̀ͅ ̵̢̭͙͇̟̣̤̹͖̦̖͚̺̞̙̘̯̒͆̇̒̆ͤ̃ͧͪͮͦ͘͘e̓̇̌́ͭ̓ͪ̒̎ͯ̓͒̓ͥ͛ͩ̈̔̃҉̴̶̧͉̼̮̜̹͎̪̘͕͇̤̠e̵̠͕͇̗̟̓͑ͣ̑͆̌̉̅ͮ͆̈́̊̓̆ė̢̹͎̹̗̃̂͌ͩͣ̇̆̀ͭ̾̎ͣ͢͠͝ȩ̲͈̩̭̞͍̑ͧͯ͗ͤ̐ͮ̄ͭͧ͌̂̅ͭͤ̄̉̔́̚ ̸̻̰̘̟̩͍ͫ͑ͮ̋̂̋͗̀̈́̈́͌͒ͤ͛͆ͫ͋ę̸̨̣̼̟̦̻͙̦̖̮̜̹̹̆̏ͥͤ̔͑͗͐ͥ̿̎̉͊̄̀ͧ͊ͥ͜ë͖̦̘̜͔͊ͮ̇̇ͧ̌ͧ̐̍̈̒̚͜͢͜ȩ̛͎̘͙͈̜̯͖̲̈̒ͬͨ̈̒̂̀͐ͯ̐̑͋ͬͮ̓ͪ͡͠͡e̗͎͓̩̖̫̫̫̤̩͙ͩ̓̈́̆ͨ͠ͅ.̨ͫ̆ͣ͋̾ͦͦ̐͊̊͑̄̐̾͆̓ͨ̚͏̨͈̝̗̗̜̣͎͇͕̜͖̱̟͓͕̞͖̘͖͜͜

I see you've updated the role variable names, cool. Asides from that, can you enable this for the tests in `tests/`? Mainly need it for `tests/vagrant/` as I haven't gotten...

Sorry for the late follow-up, I'm busy and haven't gotten a chance to run tests (takes forever) and just test it out in general, but this is on my radar...

I don't think we have to worry too much about trying to cater to specific vendors in particular. Just having the user specify IDs and what drivers to use softdep...

I'll be available to review this properly mid-Oct. Please remind me then if I haven't.

Major version bumps in this role need to support any new features/configuration changes in upstream. Please see #132. More recent examples include #137 and #141.

@BnMcG I don't quite see what you're referring to, both here and in your comment in #118. This issue is about the *reverse* direction (and discussion further evolved into implementing...

I guess I've been having this issue as well, with the environment sethamclean describes. The DHCP server passes next-server and bootfile, but I'd like these to be ignored (as I...

Sounds like a good idea. Some suggestions for implementation using the suggested schema (but should still apply in any case): - `pve_ceph_osds[*].device` entries should still remain valid/functional - there should...

> is now showing additional `osd.18` through `osd.21` per `ceph osd tree`. Right, yeah. From my interpretation those are just extra OSD daemons running for the same device (hence the...