Aura

That's right — https://github.com/discord/discord-api-docs/pull/4825 — can't find a blog post or an ddevs announcement for this, but I just tried setting in a test guild of mine (without boosts) to...

Last commit looks good, but as I said in the discord.js guild, you need to change the doc because `'MAX'` always yields 7 days and does not longer read guild...

Another alternative we're looking into internally is [`evt`](https://npmjs.com/package/evt), which uses composition over inheritance, something we have been doing with the new packages and TSR.

@Shiva953 your branch update missed updating `toJSON()`'s tests, [CI](https://github.com/discordjs/discord.js/actions/runs/6414858017/job/17425899541?pr=9345#step:9:83) is reporting errors: 

The types should match what the JS code is, unless the JS code is somehow wrong and has been for a year.

That sounds like a bad bug indeed — if some shards succeed to reply but one disconnects, we might want to have a clear rejection from it. This is likely...

I'm against this change, it goes against [RFC](https://github.com/discordjs/discord.js/issues/8015) about exposing a builder's data via getters: > Well I changed my mind, we should instead use the `data` field, however no...

A label system for shapeshift is tracked at https://github.com/sapphiredev/shapeshift/issues/201

CI is red, can you fix it please?

Upstream PR landed with different checks.