Chris Trześniewski

Hi @jeremylvln I'm working on [this issue](https://github.com/benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark/issues/98) which should probably resolve your use case. However, I think having a common markdown representation and add it to the output of the...

Hi @RowlandBanks Thanks for filing this issue. I'm putting it on my todo list as a new feature and will try to get it done but if you want to...

Hi @lavakarthura Thank you for filing this issue. We are using the [json](https://benchmarkdotnet.org/articles/samples/IntroExportJson.html) exported file and I could not find any reference to the unit there. [This is](https://github.com/benchmark-action/github-action-benchmark/blob/master/test/data/extract/benchmarkdotnet.json) the output...

Hi @jbmichel14 Thank you for creating this issue. Implementing #154 would allow us to easily integrate the creation of an issue on alert as a separate step. That could be...

# Project setup * README doesn't mention having to run `build:libs` before the app is ready to run. Ideally it should be included as a `prestart` script # App issues...

# Code improvement ideas * [ ] app state for the most part doesn't need to be globally defined. Each sub-feature should be able to load necessary data for a...

Hey @nilsfriess Thanks for filing this issue. I edited the title to make it more obvious what the expected fix is.

hey @WorldSEnder Your issue is a slightly different one. As I understand it in your case you are running the benchmarking action based on the completion of another workflow, right?...

@Mossaka I don't understand the issue in your case. The action doesn't post a new comment for each update of a PR. It rather edits the existing comment to reflect...

Cześć @krzema12 Thanks for your contribution! I've looked into your typing action and I'm not fully sold on it yet. Could you explain what are the benefits of it? For...