Yuki Kurihara
Yuki Kurihara
OK make sense! Thank you for reviewing.
For `Set` only `json` has been found, but I have the following concern. - Only [ruby/rbs](https://github.com/ruby/rbs) and [ruby/gem_rbs_collection](https://github.com/ruby/gem_rbs_collection) were checked, and I am not sure if they are also completely...
This PR has resolved by https://github.com/ruby/rbs/pull/1810
I also has released https://github.com/ksss/rubocop-on-rbs . It needs language support for `rbs`. I would appreciate it if you could consider this change.
@koic This change is still useful to me today and I would love to share it with other users. Would you mind sharing your current thoughts on this change?
@koic Thanks for the response! I've updated the README.
Squashed!
Do we need `steep-rails`?
If you're using RSpec, the aws-sdk-ruby library utilizes tags to skip test cases. Consider trying it out. https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/blob/60bd46cf9e79bb03930230a7f37e5c8540ece0c2/tasks/rbs.rake#L24
First, the `class_eval` type is not checked because the `base` is `untyped`. But if you change `base` to `singleton(Base)` it will not work as expected. I think, We should add...