Kent Shefchek

@cmungall what would you like to see as an improvement? I think one issue is we have two different IDs for the same genotypes, but this is because MGI mints...

We removed human variant to phenotype, or at least this is the intention. I think here we're seeing mouse variants related to this HP term because it has been merged...

noting that "we removed human variant to phenotype" only partially applies to the edge has_phenotype, we have variant to phenotype coming from GWAS via a different RO relation, and we...

as Nico mentioned - this scenario disappears with upheno2, so I vote we do nothing and wait for that to make it to production

Biolink currently delivers ~50 groups, which is likely too many to show. We'll need to configure a subset on the ui side. We should also convert HP to uPheno grouping...

I've made various mockups and can work on this: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/vvbWjj

The examples look great, but the licensing is a little nebulous, @kltm any thoughts as our resident JS and licensing expert?