Ken Sedgwick

> Thanks for the comments @devrandom. This makes sense. One question around VLS, if one were to implement all policies, does that require that the signer connect to a Bitcoin...

I've been using CLBOSS in testnet for a bit. I needed these modifications: https://github.com/ZmnSCPxj/clboss/pull/156

Is this the same problem as #147?

Here's what we have defined for `HsmdDevPreinit` on the VLS side: ``` /// Developer setup for testing /// Must preceed `HsmdInit{,2}` message /// NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE #[derive(SerBolt, Debug, Encodable,...

@rustyrussell I think that puts the ball squarely in our court to figure out the TLV parsing, unless I'm missing something we can work with exactly what you have.

@rustyrussell we've made strong progress on the TLV stuff for VLS: - https://gitlab.com/lightning-signer/validating-lightning-signer/-/merge_requests/644 tl;dr - by connecting this branch `use-check-power` to VLS code in !644 I'm able to see: ```...

mempool.space thinks signet has 35 lightning nodes while testnet shows 470 and mainnet has 15,487 I'm pretty sure signet would require a patch to min_node_to_process see ZmnSCPxj/clboss@ad49445 I suspect this...

I added a PR which sets `min_nodes_to_process` to a network specific value: https://github.com/ZmnSCPxj/clboss/pull/173

I'm not sure, but this seems unlikely to be caused by the `msat` conversion because it predates it, I believe. I haven't run w/ `clboss-max-channel` or `clboss-min-channel` yet but they...

Is this the same problem as #137