Yang Liu
Yang Liu
> > we do not support xtheadvector. > > I wish you would 😔 there's a lot of performance left on the table with my SG2042 not having the thead...
@archanox FYI we've added a preliminary XTheadVector support: https://github.com/ptitSeb/box64/pull/1892. We implemented most of the SSE opcodes used by dav1d, which happens using SSE a lot, and below is a simple...
Thanks for the report, I'll take a look next week.
So a change to the isa string in Makefile would resolve this issue?
There is no such thing on box64. DynaRec generates code pretty fast so we don't really need hot code statistics. If you still want this for some reason, it should...
There is room for a custom peephole optimizer for each backend we have (without breaking the precise signal processing), but it's not an easy task.
Interesting, but I guess we can add some locks to resolve this.
I’ll come up with something tomorrow!
Yes, but it's still not enough for Testfloat cases to be stable.
`64 86 8B 30 03 00 00` is `xchg byte ptr fs:[rbx+0x330], cl`, it's not yet implemented in box64 yes.