kryptobolt07


https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72438196/161684894-9c1f1b97-4aff-4578-9f9d-ef76d5f57a29.mp4

``` java.lang.RuntimeException: Parcel android.os.Parcel@b258b25: Unmarshalling unknown type code [6881398](tel:6881398) at offset 644 at android.os.Parcel.readValue([Parcel.java:3269](http://parcel.java:3269/)) at android.os.Parcel.readSparseArrayInternal([Parcel.java:3666](http://parcel.java:3666/)) at android.os.Parcel.readSparseArray([Parcel.java:2808](http://parcel.java:2808/)) at android.os.Parcel.readValue([Parcel.java:3247](http://parcel.java:3247/)) at android.os.Parcel.readArrayMapInternal([Parcel.java:3583](http://parcel.java:3583/)) at android.os.BaseBundle.initializeFromParcelLocked([BaseBundle.java:292](http://basebundle.java:292/)) at android.os.BaseBundle.unparcel([BaseBundle.java:236](http://basebundle.java:236/)) at android.os.Bundle.getSparseParcelableArray([Bundle.java:1079](http://bundle.java:1079/)) at [com.android](http://com.android/).internal.policy.PhoneWindow.restoreHierarchyState([PhoneWindow.java:2197](http://phonewindow.java:2197/))...

> Wildcard in blacklists are still not possible? Asking because you can use wildcards in the whitelist. whitelist removes the matching entries from the host file,the way it works is...

> why? it just sounds like a pain in the ass for everyone It doesn't remove pre-existing functionality (importing all extensions can be set as default or a dialog box...

I think mostly privacy related AppsOps would be viable to be monitored such as: ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION CAMERA,etc Edit:I also feel like if we could possibly monitor access to clipboard it would...

> I've filtered out potential candidates: > > ``` > ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION > READ_CONTACTS > READ_CALL_LOG > READ_CALENDAR > READ_SMS > CAMERA > RECORD_AUDIO > READ_CLIPBOARD > PACKAGE_USAGE_STATS > READ_PHONE_STATE >...

I mean maintaining documentation for such a feature rich application is too much work for a single person,the feature shouldn't anyways be used by people who aren't aware of it.

> Duplicate, this has already been considered and accepted but not implemented due to other priorities Should i close the issue? > Duplicate, this has already been considered and accepted...

> I have another concept  Looks better