krgovind

From Cloudflare's product page, it's hard for me to tell if they store/use information collected across multiple customer sites. If information is maintained on a per-top-level-site basis, adding the [Partitioned...

> What was the reasoning for a first-party-set.json controlled by a 3rd party, rather than using http headers? @dopry FYI, I responded to your question [here](https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets/issues/122#issuecomment-1672034848).

@annevk Apologies for being a bit pedantic; but I'm trying to tease apart any nuances that I may be missing: The fact that the partition key uses top-frame and current...

Answering @erik-anderson's question about what could be a reasonable solution space (not speaking to the solution proposed above): My understanding is that an explicit pattern would indeed alleviate the security...

> Is a once-per-major-release cadence sufficient? @miketaylr Asking as a newbie to web specifications - are _release cadences_ deterministic/specifiable? I wonder if specifying as a time interval (e.g. 2 weeks)...

> As a web developer and sysadmin who is considering this functionality. I would like to be able to from any domain I control, declare my first party set and...

Thanks for the question! Perhaps our attempt to strictly follow the normative format in the prescribed W3C explainer template didn't serve us very well; because I think of FPS less...

@jwrosewell - Based on the source code call-sites/references to that function, I don't believe that list is related to First-Party Sets, since the usage does not overlap with our list...

> @krgovind - Thank you for confirming this group of domains would not be considered a first party set. I wonder therefore what this set of domains should be called....

I'm closing this issue since I've answered the originally posted questions in my [comment](https://github.com/privacycg/first-party-sets/issues/62#issuecomment-911125704).