Karinna Gomez

I am not sure when the next AWG meeting is, but I think Mareca can look into attending to discuss this issue. She did contact the collections stewardship listserv to...

I would still like to find a solution for recording "title type" for artworks. I don't know if nature of ID is the right spot for this, but it makes...

> https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/3540 would allow multiple IDs, which is the correct path if these things need their own metadata. I don't think this is going to help with artworks that have...

> Yes, exactly - and, unlike now, you could treat them as equals. I see. That makes sense now. > I still cannot see how that could be a defensible...

I'm now wondering about whether the title of an artwork should even be part of identifications. The Arctos handbook says identifications "apply taxonomic terms to specimens," which does not encompass...

> Maybe the identification should be 'painting' (eg pure taxonomy unless there's some reason to do otherwise) Yes, I think we should use identifications to record the object type only....

What's important is that we are able to record metadata specifically for titles and that the title is prominently visible in the UI. If we are to continue to record...

> I think because you are confounding some things It sure seems that I have not had a full understanding of identifications. I appreciate this space to discuss issues like...

Yes, _portfolio or series_ would work great.

Are there any new thoughts on whether it would be okay to add this new attribute?