kmccur
kmccur
Would it be possible to use the object pattern syntax for field-declaring constructors? Non-field parameters can stay the same and no new keyword is needed. :) You simply prefix parameters...
I'm personally worried that we'll end up with "OK, you can use `this` to declare factory constructors and extension type constructors, but that's the best we can do."
It seems like this will incentivize people to declare fields just to use as temporary variables during initialization.