km274

Hey @sebasslash, just commenting to say that I would also love to see this functionality added to the provider, and I'm interested in helping with the implementation as well. To...

I checked out the CI test failure (see excerpt from logs below). Since this particular failure is present in some other recent CI runs and isn't related to my changes,...

Thank you for the review, @areed ! After looking back over my work, I agree that we can remove the header in most of the places you pointed out, but...

> @kippmorris7 [This is the type](https://github.com/smallstep/certificates/blob/d39a28535df1e676dd9e548be1a589d44589ec72/authority/provisioner/webhook.go#L94) used for webhooks when they appear in provisioners. The secret and credentials are always omitted. I see. In that case I understand why we...

Cool, I removed the header from two of the provisioner responses and left it on the others like we discussed. We still need to address the ACME endpoints. Having done...

Hey everyone, I just rebased since it's been a while. Is there anything else you'd like me to take another look at before this is ready to merge?

I would love to see a Terraform resource for this as well!

I started working on this, but I ran into what seems to me to be a blocker - DynamoDB doesn't have the level of support for transactions that the [`DB`...