klaus-nicat

> Ps. If it is safe to ignore errors while expanding alias records, why are those alias records there in the first place? Use case: Customer (PowerDNS with ALIAS RR...

Hi! Is there something I can do to have this PR accepted? Thanks

Just a note: If you implement serial-autoincrease on DNSSEC changes (which would be useful), don't do it for type=SLAVE zones, only for MASTER|NATIVE.

If it happens again I guess you have to use tcpdump to see if queries are sent to the resolver, if there are answers or not, and then analyze what...

Hi! We get regularly hit by issue #10447. Any things I would have to do to have this workaround accepted? Thanks

Hi! What can I do to have this PR accepted? I would happily rename it if you can agree on a config option (or will you implement fallback to TCP...

We just get hit by the same problem. Customer primary uses DNSSEC with plenty of RRSIG. Hence, the slave checks receives "truncated". AFAIK this could be worked around by not...

Indeed. I thought of adding an option to skip the checks for signature freshness. (Signature Freshness Checks are only needed as PowerDNS as this stateless serial bumping). If the primaries...

In our use case the flush would be a benefit: 1. Customer adds zone 2. Customer requests lets encrypt certificated 3. Lets encrypt performs a DNS lookup 4. The zone-list...

Any chance to have this in 4.5.2? It can be seen as a missing feature of the new zone-list cache. I promise to test it. Thanks