Kjetil Kjernsmo

Yes, I think we should have that as a very high priority after the release of v5.0.0, but it is still subject to resource planning within Inrupt to see if...

Indeed! I'll have a go at it as soon as I have head above water.

Hi all! So, I'm a total noob on node.js, but since this is a blocker bug for us, I figured I might just take a look anyway... :-) When look...

OK, thanks a lot for the quick response, @zkat ! That's good to know!

My feeling here is that we have a good definition of a storage in the spec as of now: > Clients can determine the storage of a resource by moving...

IMHO, redundant because of `Accept-Patch: application/sparql-update`.

Moreover, in https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ReadWriteLinkedData.html @timbl writes > For a while we advertized the ability to handle patches in SPARQL form like this: > > MS-Author-Via: DAV, SPARQL > > Now the...

@timbl : You explicitly OKed this in an Editor's meeting a year ago, and `Accept-Patch` was [added to NSS six years ago](https://github.com/solid/node-solid-server/commit/6da4ac8c8ab0fa92417142840c8cd87df3bd042f). I don't think this counts as "just switch"....

Since you expressed reservations about this @csarven , and it doesn't seem to be a lot of interest, and it is patching an obsolete file, perhaps we should just close...

Feel free to raise it in chats. I'm not sure we have the bandwidth to process it, that's all, and then the question is to what extent that it is...