Kris Jacque

In light of Mike's comments, maybe we need to think about the use cases again. From my perspective this looks cleaner, but with the possibility of more storage tiers in...

The failure appears to be [DAOS-11180](https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-11180), which had a fix backported to release/2.2 over the weekend.

@daos-stack/daos-gatekeeper Requesting force landing, since the only failure was the already-fixed issue above.

Reverting back the test changes to simplify this backport. I've created a new ticket to address @phender's comments: https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-11394

> This looks like it would work, it would be good to get a test for it if we can. I'll try and work on one tomorrow so it would...

The failing tests are unrelated IOR issues, and are being seen in other PRs. The ticket where these issues are being resolved: https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-11936

Is there a master version of this PR, too? Or did that already land?

> I haven't yet decided whether or not it's an issue that the raft stuff only knows about a single IP address for a given hostname. Maybe it's actually fine?...

@daos-stack/daos-gatekeeper Please use the PR description as the commit message on this one.

> Are we sure this change won't enable any undesired security consequences outside container environments? The prospect of nefarious mappings seems like something we really should think about, but perhaps...