Keita Watanabe
Keita Watanabe
Yes, I was not aware of that issue, but I fixed it.
You can check it by writing it in `pubspec.yaml`. ```yaml calendarro: git: url: https://github.com/kitwtnb/calendarro.git ref: master ```
Both of these responses are for CocoaPods and do not affect SPM, so they have not been resolved.
Changed `Result` to `Bool` and removed `throws`. So we could express by type that the previous problem does not regression. Do I need to test separately from these?
I understand what you are trying to say. This test originally reproduced the problem. I expect it to throw an Error instead of false if the object does not exist....
Rebase on `swift-6` branch and change target branch to `swift-6`. Also added `upcoming feature` to the project file.
CI may need to build with Xcode 16 to resolve build errors. 🫤
https://forums.swift.org/t/progress-toward-the-swift-6-language-mode/68315#the-swift-6-migration-2 > There are a number of previously-accepted upcoming features that will be enabled by default in Swift 6 The forum states that it is enabled by default, but where...