Albert Meltzer
Albert Meltzer
> I wonder if we could just allow each placeholder in every place, from the parser perspective this wouldn't be much of an issue: > > type wildcard is ?...
something like that, yes. is there any documentation on lambdas and where there can be used?
@tgodzik [the wildcards document](https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/changed-features/wildcards.html) mentions this: _It also removes the wart that, used as a type parameter, `F[_]` means `F` is a type constructor whereas used as a type, `F[_]`...
> Yeah, accepting all possibilities will not be correct 🤔 We might need to do different dialects then after the change is introduced. @tgodzik , in that case, would it...
> > @tgodzik , in that case, would it make sense first to introduce the allow flags that i have proposed (#2811 and later PRs), and interpret _ or *...
@tgodzik suggest reviewing one commit at a time, and make sure that `ast.scala` (which has a larger diff) is not hidden.
of course, we can release now. i only wanted to get in all the #2807 commits.
@tgodzik waiting for further instructions :)
which language requires that? is there an ebnf doc for it? any tests?
@Sporarum looks like quasiquotes won't work... :(