Kim Johan Andersson
Kim Johan Andersson
@rdp I made an attempt to implement this in https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1946 Unfortunately there seems to be no interest in this.
On 10-04-2022 07:14, Roger Pack wrote: > Is there an example of named parameters working or a link to it? > The driver does not implement any of this. JDBC...
> JDBC doesn't support named parameters. I suspect that things like select * from foo where name like ':foo' might fail? PreparedStatement doesn't, but CallableStatement does. I have no idea...
I see that org.postgresql.replication.ReplicationConnectionTest fails I don't that is related to this PR?
> > > looks good to me. There are some format only changes that I would prefer to see removed I went through the changes, and have undone those changes....
Everything but org.postgresql.replication.ReplicationConnectionTest passes now.
> > > > Everything but org.postgresql.replication.ReplicationConnectionTest passes now. > > Don't worry about that one. Ok, I won't then. Anything else that needs taking care of?
> If we're going to add this let's make sure to document exactly what's a valid format for picking out parameters. From skimming the PR I think it's any identifier...
> > > I agree with @sehrope that clear documentation on what exact syntax rules being supported are. If the proposed changes are acceptable, then I will add section to...
Looks like there is a problem with the build server currently? Some of the tests are failing on "Install software".