Kiefer Katovich

I've actually thought about this quite a bit, and think it is a good idea. For example having dfply work on top of "backends" like pandas, pyspark, etc. I haven't...

Years! Has it really been around that long? Crazy. If none of the functions work for you some other strange issue is going on. And for the record, yes as...

Yes this is the intended behavior. I am aware that it diverges from `dplyr`. I understand the rationale in `dplyr` that `summarize` would eliminate the groupings, since it is "collapsing"...

OK, I'll add the same think you added to the `dfpipe` decorator to the other decorators right now and hopefully it will clear up the docstrings displaying.

@janfreyberg I just pushed a couple changes to master that hopefully will get this working for you. Check it out and let me know if it solves your issue.

Hmm yes that does appear to be a bug. I will have to poke around and see what's going on there. If you want just the first 5 rows (as...

Wait nevermind I was wrong, it does produce the intended behavior. Right now if you `group_by` and then issue a subsetting command like `head` or `tail`, it will be applied...

Interesting. Are you using the most recent version of the package? If you clone the repo and reinstall does it still happen? Also does `df_grouped >> ungroup() >> head(5)` solve...

OK I found the dataset you're working with in this notebook: https://github.com/vineettanna/Package-dfply-Exploration/blob/master/dfply_exploration.ipynb Funny enough while answering this question I found a bug in `if_else`. Go figure... Anyway, as far as...

Yes I changed the `grouby` to be `group_by` to mirror the `dplyr` function. Apologies for the code-breaking change. One way to resolve this in your code is to have an...