Khaled Hosny
Khaled Hosny
Asymmetrical scaling can (and will) distort glyph shapes, and symmetrical scaling will make the glyphs out of proportion. There a reason the MATH table has glyph assemblies and that is...
I was specifically commenting on this part: > Aside note: Even glyph assembly can lead to sizes being off, so re-scaling with a PDF matrix is not necessarily entirely out...
See https://github.com/latex3/luaotfload/issues/285
I think we should still give a more sensible error, though.
But again, I see three different errors lumped in the same issue. I don’t think the two fvar KeyError are related to the original issue.
This depends on the engine and the font used. Loading `unicode-math` changes the default math font from CMMI to Latin Modern Math, so the difference is likely between the two...
BoldFont works with `\mathversion[bold]`, in cases where all the math formula should be bold not only the alphabetic symbols.
Exactly (and `\boldmath` which I think is a shortcut for \mathversion{bold}). `\symbf` switch to the Unicode bold math alphabets, so works only on characters that have encoded bold versions.
Long time ago I dropped all PUA code points from the fonts, I kept the gluphs in the sources but made them unencoded so they were inaccessible, and I think...
I think it might be caused by 9fedcbe32763b43bc0a60855fb4df4a584ac2217