Kevin Kreiser

@easbar @westnordost that is exactly the same measurement i used over in valhalla and openstreetmapspeeds

are you sure it isnt -32768? if it is, you have found a pixel with a `FILL_VALUE` value as described here: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/dataset_discovery/measures/measures_products_table/srtmgl1_v003 this would mean there was no data for...

yes you have to pass it as the extra parameter, and you'll have to change the tests to match it (loki_service)

honestly im not a huge fan of us changing only a single error message to expose the limit while the bulk of them do not do this. the right thing...

@reillywynn yep that's right! Thank you!

regarding the units, everything is in meters in the configs so the messages should match in my opinion. regarding this blurb: > "OSM: Path distance exceeds the max distance limit...

seems like a reasonable feature request at the very least to achieve parity with other routers. to me, although i know routing on outers or inners of an area is...

@FranckRobin yeah it would affect all areas that were marked with highway tags not just highway tags with pedestrian values. for the purposes of just testing it out i think...

indeed, others have mentioned this, the problem with putting the limit in there is that it makes the error message change depending on your config. we have added error ids...

in my opinion @dnesbitt61 is right, properly allowing the option has major drawbacks: 1. the routes are crap or cant be found 2. shortcuts have to be disabled since bridge...