Ken Kan

@ComFreek Your implementation makes a lot of sense! Thanks for the pointers. I was trying to get more ideas as to how this could possibly be done. And I agree...

@tlrobinson I'm not sure actually, as I'm in the exploratory phase as well. All I know is that what Paul envisions as "push" is like a process "pushing" control flow...

Got it. That makes sense. It sounds like your second approach is more fundamentally sound. And yes, I'm pretty sure for FBP semantics to work you'd need explicit acks. @jpaulm...

Is FBP duplex at all? When you say `A -> B`, `B` really has no way and no need to communicate with `A` except to tell `A` that it can...

Hey team! Please [add your planning poker estimate](https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/Snaps-615b3a7c08d2b20015eb6c4e/issues/MetaMask/controllers/887?planning-poker) with Zenhub @david0xd @FrederikBolding @GuillaumeRx @hmalik88 @Mrtenz @ritave

From sprint planning: Pending review of the doc Hassan just shared

From 1:1 with Hassan: We need to re-point this after meeting this Friday.

From 1:1 with Hassan: We are leaving this in the backlog to work on something more pressing.