Jan Winkelmann

Results 108 comments of Jan Winkelmann

I think this now contains all _validation_ steps that the RFC asks of the application, but there are quite a few other things it wants the application to do, that...

Done: https://github.com/openmls/openmls/issues/1604 This means this PR is ready for review!

I think I have good new and bad news. First the good news: The tests in #1599 pass now that we merged #1606, without changing the way we read from...

What is the status of the two closed, but not checked issues? Can we check then?

I think we can close this as completed.

Is this resolved by the new Storage trait? It sounds a little like it could be, but I'm not sure.

The PR is probably pretty much out of date. One issue there was that it tries to do the entire repo at once, which makes merge conflicts likely. Let's instead...

Updated the list to reflect the changes from #1243.

This is currently blocked: We need to make sure that this does not break storage stability. The way we want to do this is to add a KAT that is...

My general impression is - It's fine to validate stuff at parse time (or immediately after, but in the type constructor) for which we don't need any context - If...