kdraeder

no_assim_above_pressure is in this issue and PR because its calculation uses a normalization argument, which has been set to false, but should use no_normalization_of_scale_heights.

Nancy, thanks for the code review. I'll incorporate the appropriate parts in the next PR, since Helen closed the first PR. Helen wrote > Lets step back from reviewing the...

I think that Nancy's suggestion of use_logp_for_scale_height would be helpful. Thanks also for the clarification about when model_interpolate is called. Going back to the list of things to do from...

Some of this is veering into solutions, instead of Helen's request for "what should the code do", but that's useful too. `1)` I was thinking narrowly of the scale_height function....

Woops! I wrote this 10 days ago and got distracted from sending it. ---------------------------- Some of this is veering into solutions, instead of Helen's request for "what should the code...

This is a bit more pressing now, since I seem to have figured out all the pieces needed to run an assimilation parallel to the Reanalysis and get almost bit...

> hi kevin, to answer your question about assim vs output files -- the difference is when filter cycles multiple times without exiting, like for the lower order models. the...

> Hi Kevin, > > I started reviewing this, the changes are ok. I think the observation writing comment is a bit misleading. > > But then I read the...

> something to think about before a documentation discussion: best advice i got from a documentation writer at IBM was decide who your audience is when you're writing each part...

> > > Hi Kevin, > > > I started reviewing this, the changes are ok. I think the observation writing comment is a bit misleading. > > > But...