kdraeder

I agree with @nancycollins about clearer variable names and values and about the user's misguided choice of using obs_seq_coverage. But there are other programs that handle QC the same way,...

@hkershaw-brown I think the outline in the documentation is incomplete. I know it can't include everything, but if it includes the writing of some stages, I think it should include...

#90 (converted to discussion #331) provides context for this, but also has a lot of tangential discussion. I'm hoping this issue can focus on the contents of the "Detailed program...

There are related issues in #463, which led to [CIME #4409](https://github.com/ESMCI/cime/issues/4409) and CMEPS PRs [#378](https://github.com/ESCOMP/CMEPS/pull/378) and [#379](https://github.com/ESCOMP/CMEPS/pull/379).

Even if the SH is defined as + log(p), it still has positive and negative values. WACCM extends up to pressures that are < 1 Pa, so for example log(0.1...

If we exclusively use +log(p), then what we're calling "scale height" will decrease (change in the negative direction) with height, which is the opposite of what everyone expects. When we...

I've taken another look at the original code and the first fixes I made for Gio's problem and I see now that the original code handled the log(p) in a...

> would you be able to close your existing pull request and open another one with just the proposed changes to the model_mod.f90 in it, relative to the main branch?...

Lots of potential changes came up while debugging Gio's problem. I've tried to divide them into magagable, but cohesive Issues, so this Issue does't have the things that are more...

My (mis)understanding is that we open an issue about a manageable topic and then have possibly multiple PRs related to it, as solutions are developed and tested. I can't say...