pýrus
pýrus
/remove-lifecycle rotten
@mdbooth I still need this
> Had we considered adding new members of the LBs as disabled and only enabling them after some timeout? good idea. I need to test it in my env.
> Also can you confirm that my understanding of the problem is correct? right
So this issue appears to be more critical than it was before. I made a number of tests and neither creating a member in a `backup` nor in a `disabled`...
every member add/update action triggers the members healthcheck. if there is only 1/20 active member, the traffic will reach all 20 members until the healthcheck monitor verify all the pool...
@dulek right. can you check this behavior in your env?
Another drawback of the `externalTrafficPolicy: Local`, removing a pod from an existing service will cause downtime, since LB pool member has a delay in healthchecks. Example, you have 4 nodes...
> WRT changing the year of publication in the copyright header: what is your reasoning behind that? @pierreprinetti My goal was to split `loadbalancer.go` into multiple files, and I noticed...