Yu Kato

> > GameServer is expected to create a new Pod if a Pod fails due to reasons of OutOfpods. > > Sorry, but maybe I'm missing something - but how...

> I'm also concerned that if you delete all the pods in the `kube-system` namespace, you are also breaking Kubernetes. Usually, if a Node has exceeded the Pod's capacity and...

I have updated the reproduction procedure to be more accurate. By forcibly deleting pods, it can be reproduced in one attempt.

> I'm curious - what does `kubectl delete pod --force --grace-period=0 --all -n kube-system` force to happen? > > Is that a required step to replicate the issue? I tried...

> Also, can you share a `kubectl describe` of the Pod that has failed please as well? Sure, here it is. ``` Name: simple-game-server-qxtcq-wbs6p Namespace: default Priority: 0 Node: gke-friday-developme-gameserver-pool--f788a1c2-szxx/...

Today I tried to reproduce without forcibly deleting kube-proxy, but I couldn't. First, I deploy static pod which has similar spec with kube-proxy pod, then delete forcibly, and didn't work....

Here is the log for kubelet. ``` Jul 29 01:42:42 gke-friday-developme-gameserver-pool--f788a1c2-pdj1 kubelet[14147]: I0729 01:42:42.860377 14147 kubelet.go:1950] "SyncLoop DELETE" source="api" pods=[kube-system/kube-proxy-gke-friday-developme-gameserver-pool--f788a1c2-pdj1] Jul 29 01:42:42 gke-friday-developme-gameserver-pool--f788a1c2-pdj1 kubelet[14147]: I0729 01:42:42.860644 14147 kubelet_pods.go:1520] "Generating...

I have updated the reproduction step. I said I deployed a static pod in kube-system, but I actually deploy a bare pod, not a static pod. I created a static...

According to the [documentation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/#static-pods), Static Pods are supposed to be used by users to deploy their own control plane components, but I'm not sure if there are other use cases...

We're currently workaround this issue by running [descheduler](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/descheduler) to evict Pods failed with Outofpods. However, it delays for a certain time period, since descheduler running with cronjob. So, I would...