Matthias Köster

Now I"m confused. I thought that annotation types don't support inheritance?

If I get you correctly this allows sth. like: ```yaml /example: (Roles): - kind: Employee name: Jane Doe employeeId: 1 - kind: User name: John Doe userId: 1 ``` Right?

I see. Coming back to my initial question: Do you have another example showing an annotation type that defines a `discriminator` or at least a `discriminatorValue`? I'm still not convinced...

It would be great to define the `ID` token in the RAML spec! Given that all of the examples in the RAML specification use the yaml [Plain Style](http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2788859) the `ID`...

@StarpTech I really like your idea a lot. And until now I never thought about this use case😄 Can you perhaps explain what you mean with base fields?

@StarpTech I see. The only comment I can make at the moment is that we very likely will add support for custom fields next year to the `sync-actions` module. And...

@heshamMassoud I would suggest that @acbeni takes a look at your code and proposal. And then we can discuss this further with you.

We really like this idea and will take a look at it. Let's see how we can proceed with it 😉

Basically you are suggesting to avoid using our solution info service because you're afraid that someone might use multiple solution info enabled jars in a fat jar 😉 Or am...

I like the idea, but since it's a breaking change I would like to postpone it to version 2.0.0. WDYT?