Karl Palsson
Karl Palsson
yeah, no way. There's something else going on, or _no-one_ would be able to build. We've not run into this... _ever_ and I've never seen a makefile with "make=make" before....
I think one idea had been to just compile in st_usbfs_v1.o and st_usbfs_v2.o in the f3 makefile, but I didn't have sufficient boards to test that. if that lets you...
see also https://github.com/libopencm3/libopencm3/issues/841
I think this style looks a lot better personally!
Ify ou want standalone commits reviewed, make them a standalone PR please.
it literally says at that top that that page is attempting to _standardize_ what _would_ be required. Also, there's no requirement (yet) on what should be _in_ that message.
so what's giving you the 0.0.0.0 response? that's obviously garbage... (andentirely within yourown resolver setup...)
sounds like your system _believes_ it can do v6, but it actually can't? That site works for me to ping "test.mosquitto.org" ``` PING test.mosquitto.org(2001:41d0:1:925e::1 (2001:41d0:1:925e::1)) 56 data bytes 64 bytes...
it's json, so adding a key is transparent? what's the backward compatibility concern?
Yeah, I've been running into this a lot too. With two accounts (for two different languages) I have two columns, one for the local timeline on each server, and regularly...