Karim Radhouani

This complicates a few things like deleting the bridge or not on destroy. The bridge idea is meant to be used to connect different fabrics together, so it can belong...

In this case we need to make sure that changes like mtu and offloading are not applied to already existing bridges

@networkop are you working on this ?

Hi @tardoe, Good suggestion. We will definitely implement this in the near future.

@tardoe, is the purpose of this feature to use some of the returned values as prometheus labels? or completely replacing the metric name with a custom name ? or both...

@tardoe gnmic v0.6.0 was released yesterday, it adds support for mesage processors, docs here: https://gnmic.kmrd.dev/advanced/event_processors/intro/. I believe that with a combination of `add_tag`, `to_tag` and `strings` processors, it is possible...

I agree, this came up before but never had the time to implement it. A PR implementing this is more than welcome.

I'm not sure if I understand correctly but this sounds like it needs a separate component acting as a k8s controller for gnmic. It would be responsible for managing the...

Thanks for working on the guide and thanks for the details about argocd. Consul does a little bit more that just storage. What I meant by TTL is a way...

@melkypie if you can give the 0.25.0-beta release you will be able to try k8s based clustering. It uses leases as a locking mechanism. The deployment method is similar to...