Karol Bucek

if you guys need it than you should look into porting it over to AR-JDBC - we can not handle feature request (esp. for lesser used adapters such as MS-SQL)...

probably (or a driver behaviour), recommend you look into as getting multiple SQL-Server versions setup is quite time consuming and personally do not have much time to be looking into...

Thanks Joan, we're just mostly getting out of the "make it correct" phase ... the next should be performance improvements, but we're low on contributors here (thus no promises). If...

to sum up here, this would need some clever backporting (considering current master does work right). it might be possible to do so and resolve the issue for 1.3 but...

excellent ... thanks you @GUI ... I wish I could jump run into experimenting with optimizing the code :)

@GUI have "suffered" a fair amount of time making times compatible in AR-JDBC ... and I have to say it's still "hacky" (but at least many things such as custom-selects...

@atambo I've looked into it ... run @GUI's benchmark comparing 1.7.11 and 1.7.12, there's about a 5x performance increase with queries that load datetime / timestamp attributes https://gist.github.com/kares/45b97dcc68a78c589a35 : ```...

thanks, we're pretty low on MS-SQL maintainers. since ActiveRecord 4.x our test suite has been dead-locking whenever the transaction isolation gets changed (if I recall correctly e5f3cd8f8341f7f392c1d8) ... maybe that...

:+1: closing this one, the old branch @rdubya had was out-of-date anyways

thanks, could you please try isolating the issue in a simple test case as this is too broad of a report.