Karol Bucek
Karol Bucek
sorry but I do not thing its such a good idea (for 1.1) since it's a noticeable back-wards incompatible change. e.g. users will experience "disappearing" logs unless they configure the...
Hi Man, I just realized it's really not possible with JRuby-Rack to do right now due the way how we handle responses. It's doable but the "main" problem (at least...
You're right but it's a good fit, it's only unfortunate that it might break a Rack middleware or two. I thing I "hack" something quite similar into JRuby-Rack. Currently it...
I'm sorry for mis-guiding you that won't be enough for JRuby-Rack since you need to dig deeper the source to find the response handling code (as opposed to mizuno's response...
Hey, I was maintaining the project for a while after Nick. All work I did was in my "free time", as I did not manage to find a company that...
hey @ngc-ptin, sounds pretty crazy - I'm not sure anyone ( besides you - so far :) would benefit from building a (self-sustainable) .war that depends on the environment ......
I see - I thought you're using Warbler and than trying to avoid all the deps it packaged up fro you ... So your apps (.wars) are than started on...
OK, so puma does not need jruby-rack so it's only relevant to know the servet container deployment details. I assume it's not hacked in any way - the war needs...
thanks ... and what would be the error you've seeing - did you get any advise from the faye guys ?
I see, for future reference http://blog.phusion.nl/2013/01/23/the-new-rack-socket-hijacking-api/