kaneap

In addition, [cycleway=*](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway) does not always mean cycleways on both sides: on oneway streets cycleway=* implies cycleways on the main driving direction, so it is incorrect for iD to be...

possible duplicate of #648

To add to this `highway=track` + `bicycle=designated` is already documented (on the[ German wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren)):  Should this situation be rendered the same as `highway=path` + `bicycle=designated`? Perhaps the rendering for...

Should ferries which don't carry bikes be rendered at all? (Or perhaps very subtly) This is a cycle map after all.

Do these have much use for cyclists?

In addition, Germany also has a network of touristic scenic routes, which (many? some?) have these shield-like signs:  This one is from the [German Avenue Road](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Avenue_Road) (Alleenstraße) The...

@matkoniecz I believe there are such presets. For example the existing "Cycle & Foot Path" preset (`highway=cycleway` + `foot=designated` + `bicycle=designated`) has priority over bare `highway=cycleway`. (The "Cycle & Foot...

Would it be an acceptable solution to simply render bus stops with higher priority than other amenity points? I was able to achieve this fairly easily in my fork of...

For what it's worth, `bicycle=use_sidepath` is rendered (the same as `bicycle=no`) but this only works when the cycleway is mapped separately from the road. (Perhaps something like `carriageway:bicycle=use_sidepath` is a...

The mandatory/optional distinction also exists in the Netherlands. The biggest difference is that light mopeds are allowed on mandatory cycle paths (`mofa=designated`)