Kevin Barabash
Kevin Barabash
@ylemkimon thanks for writing this up. Is the plan to make the next release the 1.0 release?
I would say this is blocked on #1126 since we'll want to have better patterns in place to make writing more tests easier.
@utkarshrai this would definitely be good place to start. Running `npm run test:jest:coverage` should generate a coverage report in `/coverage`.
@ylemkimon the tests are passing now. Is there more that you wanted to do with this PR or is it ready for review now?
Is it safe to assume that `\ref` can reference equations that haven't been rendered yet? If so, I don't see any other way than to run some sort of post-processing....
This behaviour is probably something that should be configurable.
It's nice seeing more symbols being added. Does the font (Symbola) support all of these new symbols? It would be nice to see screenshots of MathQuill displaying all of these...
There are woff and woff2 files in the fonts directory as well as `-basic` variants which contain fewer glyphs. I'm not sure how the `-basic` variants are used though.
This also breaks copy/pasting of the `\notsubset` symbol since when you paste it, what's being pasted is `\neg\subset`.
The way desmos' fork handles macros is quite different. Instead of using `\` it just replaces certain strings, e.g. `int` becomes an integral. This works fine for their use case,...