Karl Rister

Should we pursue this or not?

Sounds good. For context, here is a link to TRex upstream discussion: https://groups.google.com/g/trex-tgn/c/XmAubHOSWoM/m/s4ZyrokoAwAJ

I'm a little confused by one aspect of this PR/branch. The first commit that I see (https://github.com/atheurer/trafficgen/pull/169/commits/d18bbeed7e6facd01605d90bf55e184c0880e176) doesn't show up in the "Files Changed" diff -- or am I missing...

> I'm a little confused by one aspect of this PR/branch. The first commit that I see ([d18bbee](https://github.com/atheurer/trafficgen/commit/d18bbeed7e6facd01605d90bf55e184c0880e176)) doesn't show up in the "Files Changed" diff -- or am I...

@ctrautma I think we can restart work on this. Obviously the first step we need to do is fix the merge conflicts.

Can you give some context on this environment? Is this a new trafficgen install and the first time it has been run? Or is it an existing install that was...

According to the [release notes](https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/trex/doc/release_notes.html) for v2.83 they updated Scapy...

As long as it is working I would leave it as is and not worry about it. We are definitely doing a non-standard installation since it is self contained in...