João Oliveira
João Oliveira
Hi @DougAnderson444 did you implement this? Willing to upstream it? 😁
> Well, the ci was breaking so that got me a bit confused, how do I work around that? can you show what was breaking the CI? or rollback the...
> > It was originally a test amongst all Lighthouse peers because other clients didn't support quic. We wanted to test to see how well the transport works. > >...
Hi, and thanks for the interest! Interesting, does the sql query also succeed if you run it directly with `mysql` ?
Hi, and thanks for your interest! what If you wrap the `libsql` connection type in a [new type](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/generics/new_types.html)? Btw, can't a `rusqlite` connection connect to a `libsql` database?
this was addressed on https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/pull/5765 and can be closed right @elenaf9?
Thanks for opening and elaborating this @elenaf9. >However, thinking about it now, I am not sure if the behavior even needs that info. As already mentioned, the event is only...
>Afaik there is exactly one ConnectionId and one ConnectionHandler per connection. But there may be multiple connections to a >peer, and per connection there may be multiple streams (stream !=...
Had an off band conversation with @elenaf9 about this issue where Elena helped me recall why I think this should be addressed with more than just logging. There is currently...
yeah it's decided then, you win 😛 Let's leave the abstractions with comments on the why they are still there