James Rosewell

Results 42 comments of James Rosewell

@lukewhitmore > "only a small minority (13%) say they are happy to share their data in return for relevant advertising" Thank you for reading. Here are some other sections I...

Perhaps @krgovind could use an existing set as an example? Google defines what could be considered a set in their [browser source code](https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:components/google/core/common/google_util.cc;l=293) today. See this list. ".android.com", ".doubleclick.com", ".doubleclick.net",...

@krgovind - Thank you for confirming this group of domains would not be considered a first party set. I wonder therefore what this set of domains should be called. Perhaps...

A proposed alternative to FPS, titled [GDPR Validated Sets (GVS)](https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets/pull/86), explains an alternative which addresses the problems with the "public submission process (like a GitHub repository)" and associated issues such...

@krgovind - My worry is that the ability to form a FPS provides a single controller that is able to form a FPS a competitive advantage over a single controller...

Re: CMA. MOW have provided a [summary of the commitments](https://movementforanopenweb.com/analysis-of-cma-decision-on-privacy-sandbox/) and how they relate to each Google PS proposal at a high level. I do not believe that First Party...

> Re: how the IEE's responsibilities would be handled? The proposed changes would provide people or their agents information about ownership and agreed use purposes if they wished to inspect...

@dmarti Validated refers to the ownership of the domains either via a) the Extended Validation SSL certificate process; or b) notaries. Once there is a method of establishing ownership proof...

@eligrey Thank you. I linked to the criticisms of EV in the PR as well as the process for EV. As a minimum it should help the group understand how...

Google have referenced this issue in the [Q1 2023 report](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/644a36abc33b46000cf5e306/Google_s_Q1_2023_progress_report.pdf). See [GDPR Validated Sets PR](https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets/pull/86) for a similar proposal which Google responded to in the [Q4 2022 report](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63d7b357e90e0773e17b27d3/Privacy_Sandbox_Progress_Report_to_the_CMA_2022_Q4.pdf) rather than...