Jeremy White

Just wanted to send a ping on this to see what's going on with it; would be really great to be able to decouple this and enable using different python...

Can you expand on the use case for this a little more? I'd like to better understand where Maestro is creating pain points for users, and it sounds like there...

+1 for jobids in the status, even if optional For cancelling, is cancelling a step name intended to be al paremeters of a step, or individual parameter combos?

Just adding the link here for the live preview of this PR while we build this up: https://maestrowf--403.org.readthedocs.build/en/403/

Ok, so I drafted up some thoughts/prototypes for some filtering options on the status outputs that should be able to address this: #402. We welcome any thoughts/suggestions on that functionality...

> @bhatiaharsh -- does the adapter work when specifying `0.26.0` in the most recent version of Flux? If there's nothing abnormal happening I don't think any modifications need to be...

> > the `v0.26` adapter did work just fine, so i dont think any changes are needed. > > the only reason i went in to make this change was...

> The current version of maestro (1.1.9) does not work with flux 0.43.0 (running on corona). > > The following change is needed to the state method in FluxInterface_0260 to...

> I tested the `matplotlib` code with the LULESH sample specification and the visualization got messy. I've not tested with the dot format yet, primarily because I need to figure...

Yeah, the layout algorithm doesn't currently take node text size into account. That's sort of a pain point currently, but i've got a few ideas for dealing with that that...