John Hendy

Okay, after fiddling with the usage of an arg on the `lbr_iiwa` and thinking that was elegant for the flange, I went back to it here, too. We now have:...

I'll look at the reviews more closely tonight; much appreciated. One main question... I see comments on files with `-2`, which I deleted/moved away from. Do you want those back?...

>The load/test files for the -2 are still there and as it stands these are broken. I missed that last comment before reading all the reviews. Yes, I intended to...

Sorry, I'm not sure how to answer. I believe for this, #117 and #118 just need time from @gavanderhoorn . I have not heard anything on these PRs since May...

I have been dabbling in robot model creation to learn the process. I thought of doing this one, but am not having luck on the [Kuka website](https://www.kuka.com/en-ca/services/downloads) to obtain the...

>...if you filter for the KR 210-2, you should get robots, not pedestals. I noticed that (and downloaded the CAD) when I posted my comment, but I wasn't confident that...

Contacted Kuka, who pointed me to the KR 210 L150-2 CAD model. To that, I asked: > Is the KR 210 L150 identical to the KR 210 L150-2? They replied:...

Actually, I wonder if I should make the L150 and L150-2 at the same time? I'll create separate .xacro files with different limit definitions, linking to the same visual/collision models.

@gavanderhoorn Finally got to this. I'm about ready to commit the KR210 L150 and submit a PR. One unforeseen catch was the definition of their joint limits. If you compare...

No problem, and it took me two weeks to do this anyway :) It's nuanced... the .stl files themselves contain the origins, so based on how the Kuka limits are...