João Cavalcante

> Is this fixed in [#3083](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/3083) ? Sorry about the super late reply! But no, even though this issue is probably a simpler fix to write, 3083 didn't include it.

Thank you so much for the review @awgymer and @mirpedrol. As @muffato said, I'm only dedicating a small amount of time every week to this project, hence the slow updates...

> In terms of the code implemented here this looks good. > > I am unclear about the impact on the following commands: > > * `subworkflows remove` > >...

> I see a linting test failing, we should update the test [here](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/blob/dev/tests/modules/test_lint.py#L435) to add a valid fake version. > > This is looking good! But it would be good...

Hi @mirpedrol. Again, sorry for the long delay. I managed to implement all three tests you had requested, so I think the PR is ready for review once again. The...

> I had to open a new PR after updating the branch because I wasn't able to push to this branch, you can see it here #3456 There is still...

Hi everyone sorry for my absence as of late, but I'm glad to see the feature getting some traction and coming closer to a merge! > A solution for this...

> I would update the branch - hard to see which tests are belongig to you :) also I am confused are there other modules gget/... ? Because if only...

For some reason I'm not being able to generate the full snapshot, every time it's failing because of connection issues.