Julien Richard-Foy

I am closing this issue as a duplicate of #2537.

Hey, I am sorry if I mis-classified the issue. It seemed to me that both issues were caused by a common problem that the binaries are not published on some...

The formula seems to only support the AMD64 architecture: https://github.com/coursier/homebrew-formulas/blob/master/coursier.rb Any PR to add support for ARM64 is welcome.

I confirm that the fact that the ARM64 binaries are generated in a separate repository is a problem here. Currently, when we publish a release here, the GitHub workflow uploads...

Hey @lolgab, thank you for opening the PR. This is a breaking change because we bump the major version of upickle. As a consequence, we will have to bump the...

I meant the API stability, which you answered perfectly! Would it be wiser to wait for upickle 4 to make the bump?

> It would be nice if endpoints4s didn't depend on `ujson` on its core but this means redesigning the lib altogether. The core of endpoints4s does not depend on `ujson`,...

Thank you for updating the PR. Actually, I see that the Scala.js bump requires relaxing the [default](https://github.com/endpoints4s/endpoints4s/blob/bac47f5e355a9c38e077bf685580c6ea0bb32cfe/build.sbt#L39-L43) version policy to `BinaryCompatible` in addition to relaxing the version policy of the...

Thank you @lolgab for your help! I see several people following the PR and (silently!) reacting to it. I am wondering if the binary compatibility issue has been a real...

Thank you for your feedback! If ujson was correctly handling numbers would you still maintain a fork? Should that issue be fixed? This is a known issue in ujson (see...